Eu4 ideal army composition.

Since EU3 I've always been bad at figuring out exactly what sort of army compositions I should use. I started visiting this forum after I got EU4 and I've seen several helpful posts and discussions on this sub-reddit explaining optimal army composition and formations. If I've understood the mechanics correctly, the ideal is:EU4 Army compositions and Unit Pips. Hey I know in the EU4 sub there was a neat spreadsheet with ideal army composition for each tech. Could somebody pls link me that one? And I don't know if that spreadsheet also has the best units per tech, but if someone has some info on that I'd appreciate it.I'm a new player and I was just wondering about the ideal army compositions,, especially for Russia if it's nation specific ... This spreadsheet have good army composition and can direct you to more in-depth guide: ... ask questions and/or talk about the grand strategy game Europa Universalis IV by Paradox Development Studio.Eg. whatever ratio of artillery to mounted units to infantry. Also what is the best way to achieve a high naval and military tradition?

Im currently playing as Germany and I just want to know what a good army composition would be. Its late game if anyone has a good composition that pairs well with Prussian ideas please share. ... The basic idea is infantry + cavalry goes in front, and artillery goes in the back. The fundamental rule is have a lot of cannons at the back, but ...The simple answer is quality for navy + land military and offensive for pure land military but there's more to it than that. Offensive is better early game because of siege ability and force limit additions whereas quality is better mid to late game because discipline, combat ability and artillery become stronger.Age of Wonders 4Empire of SinCities: Skylines 2Crusader Kings 3Europa Universalis 4Hearts of Iron 4Hunter: The ReckoningImperator: RomeMillenniaPrison ArchitectStellarisSurviving MarsSurviving the AftermathWerewolf: the ApocalypseVampire: The MasqueradeVictoria 3. Legacy Wikis. AoW: PlanetfallCities: SkylinesCrusader Kings 2Arsenal of ...

100% cavalry, only engage on flat terrain. I'm not a Tengri horde. Have around 65% cavalry if 75% is your limit, because if you lose some infantry in battle and therefore get over 75% cav ratio you'll get a malus on them. As said only fight on flat terrain like grassland, steppes, dessert etc for the shock bonus.

We would like to show you a description here but the site won’t allow us.16/4/20. If I'm not mistaken, the optimal army composition consists of your combat width full of artillery, 40% of the width of cavalry and then 60% multiplied by 1.5 the width of infantry. So basically, if your combat width is 20, you should have 20 artillery, 8 cavalry and 18 infantry. 6:4 cav/artillery for Polish horde.We would like to show you a description here but the site won’t allow us.Since EU3 I've always been bad at figuring out exactly what sort of army compositions I should use. I started visiting this forum after I got EU4 and I've seen several helpful posts and discussions on this sub-reddit explaining optimal army composition and formations. If I've understood the mechanics correctly, the ideal is:

WeaponFocusFace. •. Before you have 100% cav to inf ratio, use primarily infantry with 4 cav for flanking like every other nation. Even when you get to 75% ratio, it's not a good idea to put that much cav into your armies, because your infantry gets put in the center of any battle you fight and therefore dies first and dies more than cav.

This is why you will see many players build up 2 armies that (when combined) equal combat width & composition harmony. If you have a max width of 30, then you can have 2 armies. Example: Each army (using western tech example) has 12 Infantry, 3 Cavalry and 10 Artillery. That is about a 30 unit standing army.

There is no 'ideal' composition. There are good ones. Start with a general, always make sure you have a general. Make your army big. Bigger armies are less likely to be engaged and less likely to lose. Start with infantry. Up to full combat width or force limit, whichever comes first. When cannons come along get at least 5, 6 is better and 10 ...The "Ideal" army composistion late game is enough cannons to fill the back row, so whatever your combat width is. Then 6 or 4 calvary units for flanking attacks, then just infantry afterwards. For a 30 stack, I normally will run 16-4-10. Reply.Army composition meta/recommendations Meta Just finding out (the hard way) about how important army comp is. ... In general it seems like you have the right idea with the comp you are going for. At the start of the game armies will rely more on cav (around 4) because you may not be able to field a full combat width army and in this case ...In fact it was SO powerful in EU3, that it got seriously nerfed in EU4: You can only use 1/2 of the squares behind your frontline units and ART takes double damage when fighting in the first row (not sure if that is documented anywhere, though). The ideal army composition is 2 CAV (for the flanks) + 50% ART + 50% INF.4. Hidious8911. • 4 yr. ago. There really isn't a point to cav late game. Their main advantage is flanking but infantry get enough flanking range at tech 23 to be sufficient. And while they do more damage, artillery replaces that role later and cav get shredded by artillery. So late game you just want infantry and cav. 2.

Ideal Army Composition and Unit Types in Eu4 - Free download as PDF File (.pdf), Text File (.txt) or view presentation slides online. Scribd is the world's largest social reading and publishing site.Nice ideas to have mercenary army, drafted 'on demand'. No Time of Troubles event chain, IIRC. No 'historical rival' modificator with Commonwealth also helps in solo games. ... r/eu4 • Ideal army composition in 2023?Aristocratic, Aristocratic-Econ, Trading in Livestock/Iron, and no-Syncretic Tengri, will cut down the cost from 10/25/30 to 7.5/11.25/22.5, or 12.5% more cost on 0/1/1 vs 1/0/1. Even without Econ, the cost would only be 21% higher, while your damage increase and manpower saved will far outweights the 21% cost. Then there are your filthy banners.There is no 'ideal' composition. There are good ones. Start with a general, always make sure you have a general. Make your army big. Bigger armies are less likely to be engaged and less likely to lose. Start with infantry. Up to full combat width or force limit, whichever comes first. When cannons come along get at least 5, 6 is better and 10 ...Army composition changes depending on military tech. You typically want a full combat width of infantry, four to six regiments of cavalry per stack, and a full combat width of artillery. Cavalry is entirely optional, and you'll receive similar results if you decide to go full infantry. 6. Crimson_Ghost613.Subreddit for the Europa Universalis IV, Crusader Kings 3 and Victoria 3 mod Anbennar and its fantasy setting Members Online If I'm playing Adencia or Marhold or even non-tribal Jadd, what should my ideal army composition be throughout the campaign due to their massive cav bonuses?

Im currently playing extended timeline as bulgaria and its 876, i had some problems fighting non horde nations (same mil tech lvl) so what army composition should i use? Archived post. New comments cannot be posted and votes cannot be cast.Hey guys, hope you enjoy this combat guide that will hopefully introduce you to the basics of combat in EU4! As always, this guide is written with some bias,...

Pre mil tech 16 infantry with 4 cavalry per stack. At and after mil tech 16 start adding cannons as your economy can support it. You always want to make sure you have full combat width of infantry so your cannons don't get sent to the front row.For SP, all the best horde players use infantry only (well, and artillery if available). Horse memes can be fun but that should tell you all you need to know. 1. bronzedisease. • 8 mo. ago. 50/50 is fine. But you might get to a point where Cavs cost less. In that case get more Cavs obviously. Full Cavs is fine too.Go to eu4 r/eu4 • by sneakyplanner Army Reformer Ming trying out an odd army composition. This thread is archived New comments cannot be posted and votes cannot be cast comments sorted by Best Top New Controversial Q&A sameth1 Statesman • Additional comment actions ...Importance of Artillery. There's a couple of main factors in combat in Victoria II. First of all, artillery is very powerful in terms of damage, but is easier to kill than infantry. So you want as much artillery as possible in a stack, while having an equal number of units in the front line of battle so your artillery is not exposed.If memory serves right, in 1650 your combat width should be around 32. So a good army composition might be 32 front row infantry + 8 spare units = 40 infantry and 21 artillery to get the maximum siege bonus on a star fort capital (level 6 + 1). You can go all the way up to 32 artillery, if you can afford that.Go to eu4 r/eu4 • by ... Im currently playing as Germany and I just want to know what a good army composition would be. Its late game if anyone has a good composition that pairs well with Prussian ideas please share. Thanks! ... The combat width thing is really the ideal that I try for, but keeping it near that ratio based on supply is ...I'm a new player and I was just wondering about the ideal army compositions,, especially for Russia if it's nation specific ... This spreadsheet have good army composition and can direct you to more in-depth guide: ... r/eu4. r/eu4. A place to share content, ask questions and/or talk about the grand strategy game Europa Universalis IV by ...

Level 2 you want 1, level 4 2 and for level 8 you preferable want 4. But 3+ should work. 1: 40 infantry 40 arty. 2 : 40 canon for siege with 40k infantry in a province close as soon as you want to barage or an army appeoach, put your infantry with your cannon. 3: breach : pretty often in late game when you have too much milpoint.

Ttttttitle edit: *ideal. Same as western. Full combat width of arty with full combat width of junk in front, plus extra to avoid casualties creating flanking...and a couple cavalry to do flanking of your own if they're not at full CW.

Go to eu4 r/eu4. r/eu4. A place to share content, ask questions and/or talk about the grand strategy game Europa Universalis IV by Paradox Development Studio. ... But i have a question about the ideal army composition for sweden (both early and lategame) and what ideas i should take. And also is there any other way to get the vasa dynasty than ...A 5% discipline advantage turns a loss by 5% into a win by 5% and a 10% discilpine advantage in the same battle goes from 5% loss to 13% winning. The impact of modifiers really drives home what you also mentioned about the tedious micromanagement for army composition when tech changes.Whatever template you use with other countries just add loads of cav to that. 1. kerdead. • 2 yr. ago. Depends on your cav/inf ratio, you should follow that with a bit more inf (since if you lose your inf you will get a tactics penalty) and full backrow of cannons. 1. That guide is pretty good, there's a lazy mans variant though which is slightly more fiddly in battle but less attrition and ideal for splitting for rebel suppression. Start: 18/2/0 (16/4 if your tech / ideas has good cav) Tech 7: 17/2/1 (15/4/1 if good cav, 1 artillery for sieges mostly so can be in a dedicated army) Thanks for the replies everyone. Can't say I'm certain what composition I'm more comfortable with. I liked the 3/1/2 because of the aforementioned carpet sieging as well as the plentiful number of infantry compared to cavalry; I tend to be quite paranoid about running the risk of having too few infantry to support my cavalry after particularly … Regardless the exact numbers of the army composition, keep in mind that you should keep smaller separate stacks nearby in order to avoid attrition, since the ideal army composition usually requires more troops than the supply limit in most of the provinces. 4. PlatipusBest. Optimal damage-maximizing composition is based on the Combat Width (CW) value. The ideal scenario is having the full CW value worth of artillery (back row) and the CW value worth of infantry, minus X number of cav regiments. X is the (flanking range of cavalry)*2, one set of full flanking range cav on each flank.If the supply limit is less than the ideal army composition, split up your armies and just recombine them when you are going to engage another army, or an army is about to engage you. You don't want to take a lot of attrition. ... ask questions and/or talk about the grand strategy game Europa Universalis IV by Paradox Development Studio.What are the best army composition for different technologies?This is guide for everything land warfare.Discord: https://discord.gg/kHQKyNgddHTimestamps:00:00 The basics01:29 Generals02:46 Wargoals03:13 How do battles w...

For example, at tech 32, an ideal army composition before considering monetary costs or supply limits would be: 42-46 infantry, 10 cav (optional), and 40 artillery. Artillery shouldn’t be taking casualties so you don’t need extra regiments. Them’s the basics. Everything is situational when it comes to EU4.EU4 Beginner Tutorial #4 - War. A complete beginner tutorial with MordredViking looking at how warfare works in the game. Land warfare is the deployment and maneuvering of military assets against an enemy, in most cases this results in combat between opposing armies. In EUIV most combat is land-based and, while the naval …Tech 7: add at least 1 cannon to the fighting stack, to get +1 at siege. You may additionally make 10/0/10 siege stack, not for fighting and just for fast siege of forts level 1-3, since they are the most common. 10 infantry may be replaced with 10-16 infantry mercenaries. Tech 16 (latest tech 22): delete cavalry and fill your army with combat ...It maybe is a cheap army composition, but far from the IDEAL composition. Tech 17 and 23 are the strongest for cav in the game. Even as western nation you can easily use twice the amount of cav than in the sheet if you have the money for it. Also 4 cav in the early game is a joke for a rich nation.Instagram:https://instagram. papa john promo codesdid doctor phil cheat on his wifeeyewitness news 4 nmcollar attachment la times crossword clue At 40 combat width, undisputed optimal army composition is 32-8-40. This is making some assumptions about having a reinforcement stack nearby if you happen to engage an equal size stack. Less than 40 combat width, which means lower miltech and therefore lower supply limits is more disputed.Battles in EU4 aren't actually battles. They're an abstraction of the various interactions two armies within the same province will engage in as they bump into and chase each other around until one army is crushed completely or flees the province. That's also why the variance is so large in results. holy sepulchre cemetery new rochelle new yorkshakopee pow wow 2023 Very early game, for sure, but I think they start to decline much earlier than 1600. Cost efficiency dies even faster. Depending on tech group, your infantry is going to get upgraded at tech levels like 5 and 9, while cavalry often has to wait from 1 to something over 10.I have a question about army composition, specifically on Combat Width. Currently, my understanding is that I should always have an amount of infantry+ cavalry (in my case, I rarely have more than 4 cav) as high as the combat width, to make sure artillery lines are always 'covered'. So with a 24 width my composition would be 20+4, etc. frats ranked It's very good and informative but I have one major problem with it (I'm sure I just don't get something and it's no problem with the spreadsheet). At mil tech 16 it says ideal army composition consist of 66 units (32/4/30). Say what? My best provinces can support 41 units at best (in my current Bohemia game for example) at this point of the game.I am doing more or less fine in my second game and have learned to go after separated stacks, use terrain to my advantage and allocate generals…I was wondering if anyone knew what kind of army composition I should have as Muscovy. Ik now Russia. Have over 100 force limit but I don't feel like…